How Egypt’s Revolution Has Dialed Back Women’s Rights

Vickie Langohr
December 22, 2011

(Mosa'aberising / flickr)

This past week was a pivotal moment for the struggle for women’s rights in Egypt. In response to more protests in Cairo’s Tahrir Square, police and government security forces beat and stripped several female demonstrators. One moment captured by a photographer ricocheted around the country, and seemingly just as fast, around the world: A woman, her black abaya yanked over her head to expose her naked torso and blue bra, was dragged by helmeted security forces over the pavement. One of them stood over her, hurling his foot down at her bare stomach. Days later, an estimated 10,000 women struck back in a mass rally in central Cairo declaring, “the daughters of Egypt are a red line” that cannot be crossed.

But the abuse of female protesters in Tahrir Square is just the latest in a series of challenges to women’s rights since the overthrow of Hosni Mubarak. Soon after his regime fell, many quarters of Egyptian society started fighting to dial back many of the gains women have made in recent years. And, the success of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafis in the first two rounds of elections suggests that the new parliament may in fact push restrictions into policy.

The revolution may have come to Egypt, but for women, it may mean anything but progress.

Fearing the rollback of some women’s rights, the United States may consider supporting the Egyptian military’s bid to maintain control in the hope that that the generals will protect women’s position. But given the military’s own atrocious record on women’s rights — as its treatment of female protesters makes clear — Washington should avoid this temptation at all costs.

Women began complaining about their lack of representation in positions of policy within days of Mubarak’s departure, when the SCAF appointed an all-male committee to write constitutional principles for a March referendum. Things only got worse after that. On March 9, soldiers subjected at least 20 female protesters to electric shocks and beatings and inflicted so-called virginity checks on seven of them. An Egyptian officer justified the abuse by claiming that “the girls who were detained were not like your daughter or mine. These were girls who had camped out in tents with male protesters in Tahrir Square.” Virginity checks were necessary, he said, because “we didn’t want them to say we had sexually assaulted or raped them, so we wanted to prove that they weren’t virgins in the first place. None of them were (virgins).”

Despite their responsibility for violence against women, military officials regularly invoke their concern for the safety of female activists as a reason to exclude them from government and to maintain emergency law. After the Minister of Local Development said that he would consider appointing women to head some of Egypt’s 26 governorates for the first time in Egyptian history, the government announced that women could not hold these positions because the lack of security made it too dangerous for them to go into the streets to monitor citizens’ problems. In early October, SCAF head Hussein Tantawi argued that emergency law, the removal of which was a key demand of the revolution, had to be maintained because of the current lawless conditions, saying that “no one would believe that a man should see his wife kidnapped in front of him and raped.” The military has also launched an assault on civil society organizations and human rights groups, including one that collected the testimony of the victims of the virginity checks, accusing them of illegally receiving foreign aid and of “grand treason.”

Over the last decade, the battle for women’s rights in Egypt has centered on personal status laws (PSLs), which govern marriage, divorce, and child custody issues based on prevailing interpretations of sharia (Coptic Church law determines PSLs for Christians). A series of laws passed by the parliament in 2000 have made progress in the intervening years. For example, the new guidelines created a form of divorce, khula, which gave women the power to request a divorce without having to prove maltreatment. The legislation also gave mothers custody of their children until the age of 15, replacing earlier laws that awarded them custody of sons until the age of 10 and daughters until 12. It granted women the ability to obtain birth certificates for their children and permitted mothers who had custody of children after a divorce to make educational decisions for them. In several ways, for the first time these laws granted mothers similar parental rights as fathers.

After the revolution, conservative forces argued that women’s rights laws passed under Mubarak, like all remnants of his regime, were illegitimate and should be repudiated. For example, several thousand Salafis demonstrated outside of al-Azhar University in Cairo in May, demanding the return of educational authority solely to fathers. The general secretary of the High Council of Islamic Affairs, a government body, called for lowering maternal custody ages from the current age of 15 to age six for boys and nine for girls. Challenges came from supposedly liberal forces as well. In April, the Freedoms Committee of the Journalists’ Syndicate held a conference condemning the current women’s rights standards in Egypt. Three months later, Judge Abdallah al Baga, president of the Family Court of Appeal, submitted a draft bill to the prime minister that called for abolishing khula divorce and reinstating, under some conditions, a practice in which husbands can forcibly return “disobedient” wives to their homes – a practice that has been outlawed since the 1960s.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “How Egypt’s Revolution Has Dialed Back Women’s Rights

  1. Hello:

    From someone who was married to an Egyptian, and my daughter is his child and born here, there is a lot of sounds bits and not all is correct on these issues, in any wars or uprisings people who do not want things to change will not change. Being married to my ex and still friends with him and his family, and by the way I am jewish and he is muslim, and our religions never had anything to do with our marriage breaking up, in fact, my ex is over in Egypt right now. Yes there are issues there, but to say this about the women there and how they are treated is not totally correct. The women raised in the home were given the options of wearing there head covered or not, but of course in a mosque all must cover there heads, and legs and arms. He is in Alexandria, and from the family in Cairo, yes there are things going on, but those are with the extremists. I just wanted to give an actual review, or education on the issues.

    1. Thank you for your first hand experience of life as a woman who was married to an Eygptian. You are right we can not paint every culture/person/religion with the same brush. I personally have not written the above document, I just post social reports for all to be aware and discuss like you have how things are or how we would like to see changes. I wish you to write your story for Blue Line especially as you show that two oppossing cultures/religions can live together and accept each other, if you and your ex-husband can do this then why can not the rest of the people? God Bless you and your family Angeldn3. And thank you again for sharing your response. Regards Claudia Koelndorfer

  2. Excellent post! I have been closely following Egypt and was horrified by what I have read and seen in relation to women’s rights. Now is the time and chance for things to change but sometimes these things are so ingrained in the culture that it takes a long time. Too long. Would you ever be interested in writing for World Moms Blog? I am working as an editor and writer on human rights and this article would be great for our readers. Let me know. Thanks! Nicole

    1. Hi Nicole. Thank you for commenting on the above article. I personally did not write this article. I follow different news and social justice links and I post articles which I feel might be of interest to people. I would like to write but I have no time to do this. Occassionally I might putan original article in my BLOG but only when time will permit. Like most frustrated writers I have so many words in my head but no time to get out. I would be very happy though to share articles I find with you. Let me know if this would suit you. Regards Claudia Koelndorfer

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s